We assess your product, infrastructure and processes within agreed boundaries. You receive validated risks, clear priorities and an action plan your team can use immediately.
A green dashboard does not show whether a control will detect and contain an agreed, controlled scenario.
A long list does not show which weaknesses can be combined, how they lead to impact or where to act first.
Decision-makers need the material risk; engineers need the evidence and next step. One document should serve both.
Readiness is established through agreed, controlled scenarios—not assumptions or dashboard status.
We agree the test window with you in advance and record what is detected, escalated and contained.
We assess the paths that matter to the engagement, then show how they could be combined.
With written authorization, we test the process—not individuals—and turn the result into practical improvements.
We follow a controlled route from an agreed entry point toward an agreed objective, showing where one weakness makes the next step possible.
A severity-sorted list can still leave the relationship between individual findings and potential impact unclear.
An agreed route from entry point to potential impact, with the control improvements that interrupt it.
One agreed route to potential impact, assessed from the outside in.
Manual assessment of web applications and APIs within agreed engagement boundaries.
Cloud, CI/CD and supply-chain assessment of infrastructure as code, secrets, artefacts and identity paths.
Controlled validation of SOC or MDR detection and response against agreed ATT&CK scenarios.
Quarterly retesting and continuous monitoring of agreed external exposure.
Hands-on training where engineers identify and remediate issues in a deliberately vulnerable application.
Each engagement combines recognized testing standards with explicit authorization, documented handling of data and an agreed delivery process.
We begin only after an authorized representative signs the letter of authorization and rules of engagement.
Engagement data is destroyed thirty days after closure, including any retest period. The obligation is written into the contract.
A second member of the core team reviews every report before it is delivered.
The contract records the delivery date and the late-delivery terms.
You receive a clear account of the assessment: what mattered, how impact could occur, what is working and what to do next.
A concise view of material risk and the decisions it requires, written for non-technical stakeholders.
A visual route from the agreed entry point to potential impact, so teams can align on priority.
Evidence, reproduction steps and practical remediation guidance for the owners who will act on it.
Controls that stopped the tested route, so you can see what is worth retaining and strengthening.
A 30-day remediation window. We retest agreed findings and issue confirmation for your records.
Scope, methodology, timeline, limitations and tools used.
Four days, fixed price. We test one agreed route to impact and deliver a clear view for both decision-makers and engineers.
Discuss an assessment